Nuclear Weapons Without Speculation

Oculus Archive. First published on 08.11.2022.

Disclaimer.

The question of the use of nukes constantly comes up in comments and from my friends. There are very many clickbait videos and articles on this topic. I am, of course, also concerned about it, but I want to open up this topic and close it, so that no one else wastes time on it, neither I nor you. I ask highly impressionable people not to read, and not to watch clickbait content about nuclear weapons.

The first use of nuclear weapons caused unprecedented joy in the world, because it marked the end of the Second World War. This type of weapon is the final argument in any global conflict. That is its purpose, and only that. The use of nukes during a war is not as critical as the political and social effect after their use. Because if nuclear weapons are not the final argument, but a weapon used on the battlefield, then we need another final argument. And here the question arises: where could it be even more frightening and deadly?

There is nowhere further, because if countries use their entire nuclear potential, civilization will disappear. Not humanity; a few handfuls of people will remain. It is civilization itself that will disappear. Infrastructure, knowledge, the machines and mechanisms that support us, all our achievements in the agricultural sector; practically everything will be destroyed. People will have to adapt and look for ways to survive. The situation in Chornobyl showed that nature will recover from a nuclear catastrophe quite quickly, within the life of the planet, of course.

And contrary to popular opinion, life on the planet will not disappear completely. This is exactly what the governments of all nuclear powers know: that even in the worst-case scenario, it is possible to survive and continue fighting for supremacy in this post-apocalyptic world.

I have already written before that what is happening now is not a war between raseia and Ukraine, but between totalitarian and democratic regimes. And since these regimes of rule are antipodes, one of them cannot destroy the other. Because even in a situation where some regime wins, another will arise because of people's dissatisfaction with the current regime. I am not sure whether this is what khu#lo meant when he broadcast about a bipolar world. But the fact that today only two models of rule dominate in the world is a fact.

From an esoteric point of view, global wars occur once a century and may have several phases, depending on astrological indicators. The current war is the first phase of the clash of two regimes. However the first phase ends, after it a second will begin, and then perhaps a third, and so on until something acts as the final argument. Right now I am considering the use of nuclear weapons as the final argument, but this is not necessarily so. The final argument is a certain force after whose application war becomes meaningless.

Perhaps a massive strike with conventional weapons can also be the final argument; a large-scale ecological or technological catastrophe can also become one. But the use of nuclear weapons looks more logical.

Many political scientists and futurologists therefore state that the invention of nuclear weapons will sooner or later lead to the death of civilization, not to be confused with the death of humanity. And all because human nature is aggressive, and when a person possesses something, he cannot stop until he obtains everything. Therefore any struggle of regimes is useless and fruitless. Even after obtaining everything, after some time the regime will be overthrown, and the antipode regime will be resurrected.

From another point of view, humanity has taken too much upon itself by declaring itself the sole master of the planet. Land occupies 29.1% of the earth; even if we destroy ourselves, 70.9% will get through this time perfectly normally and will probably rejoice at our disappearance. Therefore nature should be reckoned with. A few figures: the most powerful bomb has a force of 58.6 megatons; the eruption of the Krakatau volcano was estimated at 200 megatons. Any natural cataclysm is stronger than nuclear weapons, and the most frightening thing is that we do not control it. But we continue to behave as if nature does not exist.

From the point of view of yoga, the world is alive and filled not only with the world of plants and animals, but also with subtle-material entities. And if we are not afraid of animals and plants, and simply do not respect them because they are no match for us, we do not even see the subtle-material lords, and our instruments do not register them. The only way to become aware of their existence is deep meditation. Immersing ourselves deeply in meditation, our consciousness begins to abide in harmony with the whole world, and then what is happening is seen in a completely different way.

All wars are selfish and disharmonious, and it is logical to assume that there is an antipode of disharmony. In this harmonious world, the current war looks like an attack by the strong on the weak, and not simply an attack, but a betrayal by the strong one who promised to protect. Other countries, which are also stronger than Ukraine, again promised protection. But they provided assistance. Imagine that someone attacks you, the police arrive and first hand you a baton, then a canister of pepper gas, and watch as you defend yourself from the criminals' attack.

This is the difference between assistance and protection: any pretext, whether legal or political, does not cancel the fact that raseia treacherously attacked, while the world stands aside, sympathizes, and helps to the extent it considers necessary. In a harmonious state, what is happening looks stupid, and if one takes into account that this is an endless struggle of regimes, then it is also useless. This war could have been ended at the very beginning if the strong had fulfilled their promise.

The modern world considers the universe dead, consisting of particles of cosmic dust at different stages of formation, filled with electromagnetic and other types of waves. In meditation the universe looks different; our ancestors considered the universe alive and regarded it as a superconsciousness. Let us simply suppose that nature, with its harmony, is the antipode of human egoism striving toward disharmony. And that it is intelligent, because the whole universe is one great perfect mind.

So, within this supposition, any intelligent being possessing greater power than human civilization will face a simple choice: to interfere in the development of humanity or not to interfere. If humanity constantly strives to destroy itself, perhaps there is a critical error hidden inside the species itself? Then, in this sense, it is worth reinventing humanity anew, correcting such an unfortunate error of evolution. Or it is worth waiting until humanity destroys itself on its own and perhaps evolves into a more harmonious species.

The choice will be made according to calculations of the potentially expended energy. If recreating humanity is long and expensive, nature will wait for the next turn of evolution. If, however, a critical error is embedded in our species and cannot be corrected, it will reinvent us.

Instead of a conclusion:

There is no point in fearing the use of nuclear weapons, because sooner or later they will be used in one of the global wars, so potentially this threat is with us forever. What should be feared is nature and our attitude toward it. It is precisely nature that is capable of destroying us completely and reinventing the human species anew.